A Review of False Memories: Eyewitness Testimonies

A Review of False Memories: Eyewitness Testimonies

Published on 27 April 2021

Video Creation 3 (PSYC 4145)

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
Transcript
00:00
A Review of False Memories: Eyewitness Testimonies
00:03
False Memory: an apparent recollection of an event that never actually occurred
00:22
THESIS:
00:22
Due to the fact that memories are malleable and easily manipulated, eyewitness testimonies are not reliable and should not be used as the only form of evidence when determining if the prosecuted is actually guilty
00:33
Memories in mice & humans are processed in the same area of the brain
00:33
False Memory Studies
00:41
Gorman (2013)
00:41
False memories can be implemented in mice What about humans?
00:46
Hayasaki (2017)
00:47
False memories CAN be implanted in humans
00:58
False memories can easily be implanted, but if the individual notices they are false, they can also be reversed
00:58
Abbott (2021)
01:13
Cognitive Psychologist
01:13
ELIZABETH LOFTUS
01:21
"Memories are often reconstructed, not replayed" -Loftus
01:26
358 individuals acquitted due to DNA evidence
01:26
Chew (2018)
01:37
71% of the 358 were misidentified by witnesses
01:53
Balko (2019)
01:53
"Beatrix Six"
01:59
Tried as guilty, later proved to be innocent. Still believed she did it in her mind --> FALSE MEMORY
02:14
Bryce (2017)
02:14
Eileen Franklin-Lipsker
02:14
George Franklin-Lipsker
02:33
Eileen experienced a false memory of her father committing murder
02:33
George Franklin- Lipsker was set free years later
02:50
Eyewitness testimonies should NOT be the only source of evidence used to convict an individual of a crime
02:50
IN CONCLUSION: